Overview
Marginalia is a reader for drafts of Supreme Court cases. It presents 16 cases from the Supreme Court's 2025 term, each arriving as a pile of separate documents, including the opinion of the Court, everything written alongside or against it, and every advocate's turn at the lectern. Each document is read on its own terms before any of them are compared. The site draws connections between documents, with 8550 connections drawn between them, so that a reader can read the opinion with the dissent following along beside it, snapping to whatever it is answering. The interface includes a tour that presses the same controls a user would, and it provides summaries and notes on reading the opinion for each case. The cases include Blanche v. Lau, Chatrie v. United States, and Cisco Systems v. Doe, among others.
Pricing
Detailed plans have not been confirmed in our catalog. Check the official website for current limits and billing terms.
Visit WebsitePrices and limits may change. Confirm the currency, billing period, seat minimum and usage caps on the official website.
Use Cases
- Legal researchers use Marginalia to read the opinion of the Court alongside the dissent, with connections that snap to what the opinion is answering.
- Students use Marginalia to explore all documents from a case, including arguments and dissents, and see how they relate.
- Analysts use Marginalia to examine specific connections between documents, such as between the Opinion of the Court and a dissent.
- Readers use Marginalia to access summaries and notes on reading each opinion.
- Users can take a tour that demonstrates the controls and features of the reader.
Features
AI assistant
Natural language interface
Workflow automation
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!